Every basketball and football season, sports analysts from major networks continue to preach the age old adage - "defense wins championships"- when discussing which teams can win it all, but in the baseball, the classic thought is that "pitching wins championships." It is rare to hear people discuss "defense" as a deciding factor for whether a team can win the World Series. My assumption would be that this comes from pitching being misconstrued as "defense" in the baseball world. I agree that on some level pitching is a form of defense, but lets take a closer look at fielding numbers (errors) and see if "defense wins championships", or in MLB terms, the World Series.
The Question:
Is defense (fielding errors) a better predictor of postseason success in Major League Baseball than pitching (ERA)?
New File - Errors and ERA with breakdown tab (images below)
Data Tab
![]() |
![]() |
Definite Trends (occurs most of the time)
- World Series teams tend to have an average to great defense.
- Playoff teams tend to have an average to great ERA.
- World Series teams tend to have an average to great ERA.
- Playoff teams tend to have an average to great defense.
- World Series teams tend to have a great ERA.
- The best defensive teams only represent 6% of all playoff teams, but tend to have a better chance of making the World Series than teams with an average to bad defense.
Poor defensive teams have a marginal chance at making the playoffs and will rarely make the World Series. Teams with a high ERA will rarely make the playoffs, let alone the World Series. Based on the data from Part A and B, I would say that pitching (represented by ERA in this project) is a better predictor of playoff qualification and success than fielding (errors). Great defense may not win a World Series, but it is highly unlikely a team will have success in the playoffs without an average to great defense.
Coming soon: Part C - adding offensive statistics (batting average) to the equation...
No comments:
Post a Comment